Traditional neural network design relies heavily on gradient flow, which refers to the movement of gradients during the training process. A gradient is a value (vector or scalar) that represents the direction and magnitude of the steepest increase of a function, helping to indicate how the function changes between consecutive points. The cumulative movement of these gradients across all layers in a neural network is referred to as gradient flow.
Each layer in a neural network is essentially a linear transformation derived from the gradients, adhering to the universal approximation theorem (UAT). According to the UAT, a neural network with a single hidden layer containing a finite number of neurons can approximate any continuous function to a reasonable degree of accuracy within a compact subset, provided suitable activation functions are used. The non-linearity required to model complex patterns is introduced via activation functions, as stacking linear transformations alone would be insufficient for learning intricate relationships in data.
The Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) fundamentally rethinks this traditional approach. Instead of relying on fixed activation functions, as in traditional neural networks, KAN leverages the Kolmogorov-Arnold theorem, which provides a way to exactly represent continuous functions as sums of univariate functions. This approach allows KAN to be more accurate and interpretable while requiring fewer parameters. Unlike fixed activation functions, KAN introduces learnable activation functions. By making the activation function dynamic, the model can adapt better to the data it is trained on.
KAN achieves this flexibility by using B-Splines to train its activation functions. B-Splines are efficient representations of curves, using a series of connected lower-degree polynomial segments rather than a single high-degree polynomial. This approach ensures smooth transitions and reduces the risk of overfitting. The positions of the B-Spline control points are made learnable, allowing the model to adjust the shape of the activation functions dynamically during training. This enables KAN to develop arbitrary, data-driven activation functions that best fit the problem at hand.
One of the key strengths of KAN is its capacity for continual learning. However, a notable drawback is its slower training speed. Research shows that KANs can be up to 10 times slower to train compared to multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) with the same number of parameters. Despite this, KAN often outperforms MLPs in terms of overall efficiency, as it typically requires fewer parameters to achieve similar or better performance.
In summary, KAN’s innovative use of learnable activation functions via B-Splines and its foundation in the Kolmogorov-Arnold theorem make it a powerful, flexible, and interpretable alternative to traditional neural network architectures, albeit with the trade-off of slower training.
Nice video: